The Dropkicks is a rugby podcast and sports blog site illuminating your path through the murky world of international rugby, league, cricket, football, baseball, motorsports, golf, netball and competitive eating.
You may have seen Richard Boock's article in the Sunday Star Times yesterday. If you didn't, here's the online version.
Boock is a writer I don't agree with very often, and this latest article is no different. In trying to write this, I first turned to my ever-faithful Oxford dictionary which offered the following as one of 5 definitions of sport:
An activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others.
And yet I still don't quite agree with this - I think that there is a far wider scope than the 'physical exertion' aspect.
What does Hot-Dog Eating have in common with the World Rally Championship? What does the WRC have in common with Golf? What does Golf have to do with Poker? The answer is that all involve a serious mental aspect. All of the above I would define as sport - because not all sport is about physical exertion, sometimes it's about putting the mental focus first, like in golf and poker. Sometimes it's almost entirely physical, like UFC [boxing not so much, even that has a mental aspect both within and without the ring] and BMX [go Sarah Walker woohoo!]. And other times it requires a balance of both.
And yet there are still more times when an athlete has to compete on a pre-determined scope of mental and physical actions, while being able to be flexible if events in front of them change without warning - this is the bulk of sport, NFL, rugby union, football, V8 Supercars, basketball, etc etc.
So in trying to argue Boock's case, I have found myself needing to come up with an improved, but simple, definition of sport. One which I propose, having devoted my lunch break to the task, as being:
An activity comprising of a significant amount of physical or mental exertion and in which an individual competes alongside others or alone against another opponent, ranging from a number of single competitiors to a team.
I'm a big fan of V8 Supercars, as you already know. I also like Craig Lowndes. And computers. But I don't like breast cancer. Now I can use the first three things to try to stamp out the last one. YAY!
Unfortunately the Norton ad isn't as good as the ones on his craft:
Recent comments
Haka lyrics - Kapo o Pango and Ka Mate [+video]
Nautirulz says: Good Stuff...I live in a small Aussie town with 7 million of them and only 4 of us...(well it feels like 7 million of them haha!)...But everytime the ...
All Blacks v Springboks highlights and stats
celine says: Seems that All blacks reigns over Springboks....Keep it up..I am a solid fan of All Black, Though they have a number of lost I still believe that they...
Tri Nations Game 3 Review: Australia v South Africa
Jimmy says: Seems Rattue disagrees with you on O'Conner. And somehow that performance by the Wallabies was evidence of a renaissance caused by Deans genius coachi...
Tri Nations Game 2 Review: All Blacks v South Africa
Naly D says: Personally I think the Cowan/Weepu debate is a flawed one. Piri usually comes off the bench between 50-60m in and because he's more of a league halfba...
Tri Nations Game 2 Review: All Blacks v South Africa
noizy says: Surely the 60mins sub thing is just R&R in disguise? ...