User login

Navigation

RSS/XML/Podcast Stuff

About

The Dropkicks is a rugby podcast and sports blog site illuminating your path through the murky world of international rugby, league, cricket, football, baseball, motorsports, golf, netball and competitive eating.

Email us

The Dropkicks Team

More of us at...

chiefs

Rugby Review: Round 7

Posted by Naly D on Thursday, 01 Apr 2010.

Boomshanka starts us off with the lead-off single on the Blues


yeearch...

Sometimes when you get close there's no cigars for you.

The enertainment delivered, the lead changed, the Blues backs had
solidity, but 'just scored' complacency crept into the game... not
good against a hungry New South Welshman at home... chewing on the cud
and  shit. in that field that time.

What will the Blues make of this? Season vapour? Still semi's
potential if they focus?

Fuck Yeah. Aspects are improving. They are developing a rhythm. But
this is where it gets hard(er). And opportunitys like that will
require the opposition being in the coffin and having the nail put
into it.


Then there's Richard Irvine's interpretation of the Chiefs


Hopefully at the end of this season, we'll be laughing about this low point when we're celebrating our first Super 14 title while dancing through the streets of Hamilton trying to keep down Waikato Draught burps (WD is notoriously gassy, team).


Yes, this was a shitty game, and I was really shitty afterwards, having wasted valuable Friday night sleeping time (you may imagine the sportreview life is a rock n roll one, but you'd be wrong, very wrong) to watch it live. The Chiefs were up against a wave of emotion on the back of Julian Huxley's return to Rugby after a brain tumour and offside adjudicating as fair as a kick in the nuts.


And yet we were right in it until the end. I can't understand why Masanga wasn't given more ball, he looked dangerous to me. I also can't understand why we kicked all our posession away as if he ball was covered in sick. The bright spot was the defence - which was lucky, as we spent vast periods of time in our own half and without the ball like 15 unemployed ball boys.  


So, like I say, let's move on. Those wins on the road are becoming more and more handy, and if we can attack like we've been defending, we'll be right.


Next, poor bloody Jimmy who's actually the only supporter of a winning team this week - the Highlanders



Its hard to believe that we're already halfway through this competition, and as it has been over the last few years, its been pretty boring.  All that changed in the weekend of course when the Highlanders ticked up a win against the Lions.  I was drunkenly ecstatic at the time, and must apologise if you really didn't want a stream of rugby tweets invading your twitter on Friday night.
 


Once sobriety kicked back in the glory of the win began to be tempered a little by the knowledge that this was the Lions, a team that had managed to score 65 points and still lose - lets be completely honest here, their defensive game is completely inept.  Getting the four points was good, but the Highlanders need to realise that they let themselves down by not scoring a bonus point, and by leaking so many points against a crap team.  If it weren't for the Lions' breakdown infringements, and Israel Dagg's kicking performance, the Highlanders would have lost again.


Most of the Lions good scoring opportunities came from lineouts within the Highlanders 22m.  They'd shove about 10 guys in, set up a rolling maul and then push over for a try.  Now, i've got just a few problems with people suggesting NZ have forgotten how to maul - we're not good at it, sure, but I think there's something else going on here.


Remember during last year's Air NZ Cup opening rounds, how whenever the lineout jumper landed betwixt his two props who had formed either side of him before he was tackled.  That was rightly penalised - but not so this year.


The definition of a maul (all from here - http://www.irblaws.com) is thusly - 


"A maul begins when a player carrying the ball is held by one or more opponents, and one or more of the ball carrier’s team mates bind on the ball carrier."


Now, as you're not allowed to tackle someone in the air, this definition means that the ball carrier has to land, and the defending team has to have an opportunity to tackle and hold him.  The props bound on either side are essentially conducting an elaborate tackle disruption, and should be being penalised.



Section 17.2 (c) of the Rugby Laws says:
 


"Placing a hand on another player in the maul does not constitute binding."


The relevance of this law comes when the defending team starts to splinter the maul - when this happens, the half that has broken away should be required to let go of the maul, put their ball carrier in front again (ready to be tackled & held) and run at the defensive line away from the obstruction of the remainder of the maul.  Instead you often see guys with a handful of their team-mates jersey, but arms not wrapped around, and no penalty when they use the players in front of them as an obstruction for the defending team.



The real trouble from mauls comes from 17.2 (e)
 


"A player must not intentionally collapse a maul. This is dangerous play."


I believe this is a relatively new law that was instated due to concerns about injuries resulting from sacked mauls  - I hope some empirical evidence was used to identify that injuries were occuring, but lets agree that they do - this was removed as part of the ELVs, but has been reinstated again.  Now the trouble is that referees rule on it by asking, 'did the maul collapse'?  Not, 'was it intentional'?  


Now, im not naive enough to suggest players don't sack it deliberately, but when you've got two forces pushing against each other, all sorts of things can happen, when you through in our flexy, twisty, bendy bodies well that just makes it worse.  And so, in the very act of attempting to defend repeated rolling mauls the defending team is actually at great risk of losing players to yellow cards, and I wonder if this is why if the maul cannot be stopped as the player comes out of the lineout that teams appear to just back-pedal ineffectively - they're too scared of being penalised.


Anyway, that's enough about the maul.  Go the Highlanders, may you have many more glorious victories (though I don't think you will, so keep developing the Robinson, Hobbs, Lynn partnership for next year).
 


Now I'm up about the Hurricanes.


I'm being lazy and linking to this, which says pretty much everything I was gonna write.


http://wotzon.com/diary/JBishop/


Other than to add WE'VE ALWAYS RUN IT FROM OUR OWN HALF.


Partly because we've never had a world-class first-five, partly because IT'S EXCITING!


Examples:



And last - and possibly least - Isaac Ross' fitness consultant.


As the wonderfully amazing Crusaders had a bye this week, I wasn't planning on writing and therefore watched no games. Many of you/most of you will be unaware that Naly and myself have a bet placed on our teams, beating each others teams. I'm sure the banter is going to continue until the end of the competition and, so you are all in the loop, I will fill you in. 



The grounds of this bet are: If the Crusaders end up higher on the table than the Hurricanes - I get $100. If the Hurricanes end up higher on the table than the Crusaders - Naly gets $100. If both teams make it to the final, and the final is in Christchurch - Naly flies down. If the final is between the two teams and in Wellington - I fly up. Pretty simple really. It was witnessed by two of our friends at the Sevens this year, so there is no way he is getting out of this one.



I am looking forward to getting my money!



All the best for this weekend, mate. You are going to need it! 

Rugby Review: Super 14 Round 3

Posted by Naly D on Wednesday, 03 Mar 2010.

Rugby Review is a new series debuting for The Dropkicks. Put simply, it's a way of following a team through the fans eyes. Are Crusaders fans really one-eyed? Have Highlanders fans lost all hope? You'll follow the team through 5 fans. I'm looking for someone to do the

Blues each week, so please leave a comment if you want to do this!

The Chiefs: By long-time friend of The Dropkicks, Richard Irvine

x610.jpgJohn Mitchell talks you through the Chiefs vs Western Force.

G'day. I'm John Mitchell. You may remember me from 'sitting next to Clive Woodward like a sack of wet sand' and 'I can't believe the All Black coach hasn't been sacked yet!'. That one came out in 2003. So the Chiefs played the Force on Saturday night; I have fond memories of Waikato and the Chiefs - I had hair then - so I want to see them do well. On the other hand, the Force are a pack of whinging little bitches, and I want to see their hearts ripped out, piled on the 22, then set on fire.

Just joking!

Luckily, the Chiefs came to the party and bitchslapped them. Good one. If those Aussies hadn't gone all Lord Of The Flies on me, they'd be the fucking Crusaders by now. I think the lesson in this match is "This is what happens when you fuck Mitch in the arse". For the Chiefs, who are three from three, I think the lesson is "Watch your back" - life plays some fucked up hands, and just when your career is going great, there are ALWAYS people out there wanting to stick a knife in your back. Always. Take it from Mitch, I know.

 

The Crusaders by Ti'i Paulo's 'special nutritionist' As predicted, it was a good week for the Crusaders. They played the Sharks, at home, on Friday night and I was much more pleased by their performance. The Crusaders had not been defeated by a South African Super Rugby team at home since 1996, and I was glad to see this remain.

The game was light-years better than last week’s game, against the Reds. There wasn’t anything overly spectacular about the game. It was just a good game of rugby. It was such a massive improvement, it was like watching a completely different team!

As I have left this review to the last minute, I’m just going to sum up the Crusaders' ROUND THREE

Richie, AKA God, is back.

Outstanding scrums.

Up at half time: Ten – Six.

Never would've known we lost so badly last week.

Dan Carter overtook Matt Burke on the all-time Super rugby scorer’s list. (Now 3rd)

Thirty five – Six: Final Score.

Hottie, Zac Guildford: Multiple tries. One intercept try.

Runaway ending. Two tries in 10minutes.

Epically annihilating tackles.

Exceptional crowd attendance.

I'm looking forward to much of the same in Round Four.

Hurricanes, by me

King Carlos came to town and he brought the Clever kid. 'Los didn't do a hell of a lot - and got a lot of sledging thrown his way from those in the crowd - and I'm not sure what people expected him to do anyway. Lining up outside it looked like there'd be an amazing crowd - it took us 20m to get in in the first place. But it wasn't. It was an ok crowd, but surely not much more than 16,000.

If you could look up the Hurricanes on unencyclopedia, this would be the match that accompanied it, with this blurb.

The Hurricanes are a team based in Wellington, New Zealand. They play their home games at the Biscuit Tin. The Hurricanes have historically been a team with a lot of promising talent, but often that talent has been squandered in favour of white line fever. This sports team simply refuses to learn the basics, opting instead for flashy, 50/50 ball play [which is more often than not 20/80].

The February 27, 2010 match against the Lions was the personification of this. The Lions were not fancied to win this game, as they have been shown to have a weak defence. The Hurricanes decided to exploit this by trying to set up 60m solo tries, instead of getting the team to work together to get 4 quick tries - securing a bonus point - and then resort to flashy football.

We're off to South Africa for three weeks, minus Conrad and Tamati this week, and the Pig for a season.

Oh, and can I say the Seal Slayer's try against the Lions was amazing and hilarious. Best bit of rugby satire I've ever seen.

The Highlanders, by Jimmy

This game is the first one this year that's highlighted what for me is the major deficiency of "Super" rugby. Waking up at 4am on a Sunday is hard. You might wonder why I was waking up at 4am? Well, try as I might I just couldn't find a replay of the game being shown at a reasonable hour on Sunday. There were replays of the Crusaders' game, which you may recall was played at NZ time, and replays of the Blues' game which finished well before midnight. So someone at Sky clearly doesn't think anyone wants to watch the Highlanders play at a normal time of the day.*

The scheduling of the kickoff in the afternoon can't have helped either, it would have made more sense to have a night game in Africa, which I think could have been 6:30am here in New Zealand. These crazy time zone differences are why I got really excited by the idea of changing Super rugby to being more of a Champions League type competition, which would help to limit the amount of time players have to spend miles away from home. That, or just ditching the Africans from the competition and playing with Pacific and Asian teams; though I suppose that would probably kill the presumably big earner of the Tri-Nations.

Anyway, all of that is by the by, because I haven't been asked to deliver a state of the Union, but rather a fan's perspective of Highlanders games, so I should probably crack into it. The Highlanders won!!! I don't think they won pretty, and maybe they were robbed of a bonus point, but bagging 4 points in Africa is a big achievement at any stage; even if the win is agains the Cheetahs who apparantely haven't won back to back since they returned to the comp.

I couldn't believe the investment the Highlanders were making in Hobbs when they have Robbie Robinson in the squad, but the guy has sure proven me wrong. He's put in solid performances in the first 3 rounds, and scored 4 tries to boot. I think the balance of the team with Shoemark at 12 (surely he's more natural there than at centre, what with his good kicking game?) and Lynn at 13 was great. As awesome as Jayden Hayward can be, I think he's a little too inconsistent at this level yet, and having a relative veteran like Shoemark outside Hobbs must surely be a calming influence on him.

However, I also liked the tactic of bringing Berquist on at the end to calm the tempo and keep the Cheetahs pushed back in their own half - that backline trio might be a good starting trio against some of the teams that can control their game better than the Cheetahs. Then you can bring Lynn on for Berquist and push Hobbs in one to up the tempo in the last 30 minutes.

Having praised the win, I did have some questions about the tactics the backs employed a lot of the night. It doesn't seem to me that the new rules make kicking possession away constantly a good idea. While Ben Smith had a great Air NZ Cup campaign last year, that hasn't yet translated into Super 14 form, so putting bombs up constantly basically means only Dagg is going to be able to get up in the air & compete for the ball. Dagg by the way, had a reasonably good game, especially with the added responsibility of having the goal kicking duties.

My only other comment on the backs, is that Jimmy Cowan had, by his standards, an average game. A couple of kicks went awry and he just wasn't his usual sharp and decisive self. Jimmy is awesome, and not just because he shares my name. I think its great how he shook off all of that (admittedly fairly self-inflicted) crap, and has really stood up and made the most of the opportunities he's had. Here's hoping he's back to his best next week, because the Highlanders need him at top form.

The forwards had solid games for the most part - I don't think they were being out-scrummed, but rather that the referee was allowing some fairly iffy tactics from the Cheetahs front row. The loose forwards were solid, and though Thompson looked a bit out of place at times at No 8, I like the additional pace that the trio had. Up against Smith & Broussow I think the really held their own. Its interesting how the effectiveness of Broussow has been nullified by the new rules - last year he might have earnt his team 10 penalties from his efforts at the breakdown, but now with the law being interpreted correctly (ok, differently) he had a quiet game.

Apart that is, from scoring the first of 3 tries to be sent to the TMO, and the one that I thought was the most obviously not a try. The ball hit the ground, but to my eyes at least he had clearly lost control of it prior to that. Smith's try I would have given the benefit of the doubt to, even though you couldn't actually see it hitting the ground - but the 'daylight' between ball and line for Thompson's disallowed try wasn't visible on my telly.

So, robbed of a bonus point, but 4 points in the bag in their first fixture in Africa. The Stormers should be a tougher prospect, but a winnable game - and if the improvements continue week to week the Bulls might be a competitive game. But coming up against a team that's had a nice break with the Bye week, I think im being overly optimistic there! Anyway, this is one pretty chuffed 'almost' fan!

* I'm willing to admit that i'm either blind or stupid and there may have been a replay that I just couldn't find when searching the Sky website. But to be fair, when I entered 'Highlanders' into their search box, only one result showed, and that was for a replay of a game in the future anyway. So, instead of a handy search feature I had to scroll manually through their fugly TV Guide thing, which is slow so I gave up after getting to Tuesday.

Rugby Review: Super 14 Round 2

Posted by Naly D on Thursday, 25 Feb 2010.

Rugby Review is a new series debuting for The Dropkicks. Put simply, it's a way of following a team through the fans eyes. Are Crusaders fans really one-eyed? Have Highlanders fans lost all hope? You'll follow the team through 5 fans.

The Chiefs: By long-time friend of The Dropkicks, Richard Irvine

Nobody's saying this is the future of Rugby. 137 points with 18 tries might save you the bother of fast forwarding the boring bits, and leave defensive purists reaching for their well worn 2000 Super 12 final VHS, but feck it, I don't care - I LIKE that every so often two teams in the right mood can produce a freak game. It's fun. This is only the second round, and if you can't mix it up and throw the ball around now, when are you going to?

My Chiefs, who lost their first two games last year and still made the final, have got their South African leg out of the way early, and won both matches. Richard Kahui is back, and Stephen Donald looks comfortable at the level that suits him best - many teams would love his experience and execution in their side. They won't be defending like this in May, I think they'll be better for this attacking hit out, and better because Sione Lauaki probably won't be wearing the captain's armband again. Of course, the main thing is games like this annoy Stephen Jones more than a long train trip in a carriage full of clowns. All of New Zealand can enjoy that.

The Crusaders: reviewed by Dan Carter's 'Special Masseuse'.

It was the one game of the year that really would’ve been better suited to the Comedy Channel. Yes, the Reds v Crusaders game played on Friday night. It was up there with the worst rugby games I have ever watched. 80, excruciating, minutes of non-stop shit rugby by the Crusaders. It was actually laughable.

As an avid Crusaders fan, I understand that every year they always start off slowly. But this game was something else. They were barely even worthy of being a Super Rugby Team. Yeah, I just said that.

With such an amazing record attached to the Crusaders I, along with the rest of the rugby world, expected more of the supreme team. 7-time Super Rugby Champions and they get beaten by the Reds. A team barely anyone remembers. It was shocking. You know it must have been really bad for me to admit that it. I was, for a moment, embarrassed to be supporting the team. However, even on a bad day I will remain a devoted supporter. They are marvellous.

We all know they are the greatest team of the competition but they way they played on Friday night was not even as good as a Second Division team. Too many basic errors, school boy errors. I can’t pin-point one word that sums up their performance but many words come to mind: horrendous, appalling, disastrous, error-strewn, unbearable. Basically it was the most hideous display of Crusaders’ rugby for a long time.

They played so well the week before that I gloated to people supporting other teams, mentioning that the Crusaders would continue on that momentous roll. It was the first game of the season and heeeeeello bonus point. It became apparent during round two that I had spoken too soon.

I’ll give credit where it is due: the Reds deserved to win. Simply put, they were the better team on the night. They absolutely pummelled the Crusaders, and I think it is what we needed. The Crusaders needed to be shown that even though they are the best they can’t get cocky and think they are unbeatable. They are a better side than the one that played on Friday, and we will get to see that they are this week. I have no doubt that we will see the Crusaders at their best this Friday. They are back home and will have wonderful supporters like myself there cheering them on. And...

Richie is back!!! He’s on the beach. He’s been away because of a clause in his NZRU contract, or something-or-other. Anyway, most important thing is that he is back! Along with being gorgeously good looking for the female viewers, he actually adds so much to the team. I know a team isn’t one man but as soon as he pops back in the mix everything changes. I think it is a little obvious I think Richie is God.

I believe psychics would be saying that round three will be a good one for the Crusaders.

Bring on Friday.

The Hurricanes: by yours truly

Honestly I don't think I can say anything about this game I won't say in the podcast. It was a game the 'Canes obviously came into treating as a practice run. Tamati's league-style play to set up Cory and David was outstanding, other than that it was a confidence-building game for the team against a schoolboy XV.

The Highlanders, by 'fan' Jimmy.

I should probably admit straight away that I'm not really a Highlanders fan. I mean, I do really like that they have a guy running round from time to time wielding a fricking claymore but, I live in Wellington and thus my primary allegiance is to the Hurricanes. The Highlanders are my second favourite team though, and in all games where they aren't playing the Hurricanes I'm rooting for the boys from the deep south. This essentially means that I'm constantly rooting for the underdog, because admit it- who really expects the Highlanders to win on a regular basis?

Knowing this helps to know why it is that I like the Highlanders. My second favourite NPC / - AirNZ Cup team has pretty much always been Southland. Perrenial strugglers that have come good and are now dominating their bigger Super rugby franchise player. Winning the log of wood was awesome and, I think anyway, just reward for an area that's been putting on the hard yards, doing the basics before attempting the flash. I want to see a team thats suffered finally turn the corner, I want to have the good time that Chiefs fans last year had - albeit with a happier ending.

The other reason I'm such a Highlanders fan is the Magpies. Hawke's Bay rugby supporters have a complex. Some describe it as a sense of entitlement, but it's really more one of desperation. Hawke's Bay fans really didn't cope with being in the 2nd Division. But what was really hard was getting so close to promotion and never actually making it. It doesn't take too many years before you start seeing rule changes as being deliberately designed to keep you out. And every player having success in another team would have been the key to being promoted.

These were dark and horrible times, and I should know - I grew up in the Hawke's Bay. Other than the All Blacks, when I was a kid, you wanted to be in the Magpies. Guys from my high-school played for them, hell my old Head Boy Michael Johnston is still running around the paddock. So, with the use of so many Hawke's Bay players and our coach, its only natural that I want to see the Highlanders do well. Because if there's anything a fan of Hawke's Bay rugby needs, its validation that we actually are ok, and really do deserve to be in the top flight.

What a game the Crusaders v Highlanders match was. Weirdly, whenever the Highlanders play the Crusaders I get a sense of confidence about the victory out of all proportion to reality. I actually expect them to win every time. And had a couple of calls gone the way of the Highlanders we might have seen a different result - particularly when viewed with the hindsight of knowing what the one-eyes were going to bring the next week against the Reds.

I have to apologise though, as despite being the pseudo-fan that I am, I didn't actually manage to catch much of the game vs the Blues. Instead I was drinking Tsingtao and having a great dinner at Longxiang. So I can't help but feel a little bit personally responsible for their loss to the Blues, especially because its the Blues who haven't been a great team in some time.

If only the Highlanders could bring the passion they have when they play the Crusaders to every game, things might be different for their fans. Even a sort of, but not really fan like myself.

I'm still looking for someone to do the Blues. Leave your nomination in the comments section if you're keen.

Chillin' With The Chiefs Vol 1

Posted by Naly D on Thursday, 21 Jan 2010.

Scene: The Outback.

normal_Sione_Lauaki__1_.jpg

Sione Lauaki: Sup dox?

normal_Ian_Foster.jpg

Ian Foster: Sione! You're late. Now that you're captain you can't do shit like this.

Sione: Sorry dox! I was watching this new video on my computer. 'Cause I didn't get a new phone from Telecom last year 'cause I wasn't in the All Blacks! That's pretty stink. But the video's got LaDanian Tomlinson in it. I reckon we should base our offense on it this year!

*Breaks into song*

SL style electric gliiiide

*Drops ball, knocks it on*

Foster: Good, you haven't tried to improve your gameplay over summer. Right. I've called you all here to talk about the upcoming pre-season Super 14 match against the Highlanders piss trip. I've already spoken to them, and they've agreed to bootleg us some moonshine. So we're all good on that front. Now we've just got to sort out a gameplan.

5296_1022371739432_1829387180_50476_5830263_n.jpgRichard Kahui: No sweat Fozzy Bear. We've got it all sussed out. They can come out with me, 'cause then it'll make them all look hotter and they can get the wimmin I don't want. 'Cept for Tim Boys, 'cause he'll fit right in anyway.

Foster: Awesome, great to know you've got your priorities right. Everyone chop one back now!

*Whole team sculls a can of Waikato Draught*

Fantastic. I don't see why people question our pre-season routine every year when we get injuries. Alright boys, chant time. On three, fuck them up.

1, 2, 3.

Whole team: Fuck them up! 

 

Buying in to the American Dream

Posted by Naly D on Wednesday, 18 Nov 2009.

So my son, you've decided from my exposure of American sports that you want to start following a team. You don't know which one to choose, so you pick the one with the cool pirate logo/player who sets the most records/team which won last year. STOP!

Because I really, really care about you [and Dom too], I've done a team-by-team comparison of the NZ Super Rugby teams and revealed their Baseball, Basketball and American Football equivalents, so you can get that true patriotic feeling rather than just blindly following a side for no real reason.

You've captured my attention, take me to the article!

How's Your Jersey? My Jersey is Super! Thanks for Asking! Part 2

Posted by Naly D on Tuesday, 17 Nov 2009.

610x__1_.jpg

I caught a look at the 2010 Super 14 uniforms to be used by the New Zealand teams yesterday and I was not impressed. I'm not going to try and water it down. They're pretty damn awful.

Firstly, what happened to the whole 'adidas only release a new uniform every second year' thing that was in the press last year? Yes, the signing of BNZ means that new uniforms are needed. But look at the Canterbury jersey! Notice anything missing? And it's not entirely obvious from the terrible pictures I can find, but it looks like the 'watermark' motifs of last year's jersies have gone the same way as the sword - but I'm not entirely confident to say that.

All the other jerseys appear to be the same except - Oh wait! The BNZ logo!

We were lucky in the past that the Ford logo just seemed to fit on the jerseys. But why do the Chiefs have a white version when there's no white on their uni? [except names and numbers on the back] Why are the Hurricanes the odd ones out with blue? Is there not a black option?

Obviously the white is just a ploy to get maximum exposure on the telly, but it looks horrible, is it day-glo or is it just shiny white?

The Chiefs should be able to have a yellow version for home and away, because their strip has gone from being the best in town to looking filthy [their away strip is even worse].

The Hurricanes and Crusaders would look better with a black logo for their home shirts, and the Cru could do with a red option for their away strip because while it may stand out in that first photo, when the camera flash doesn't bounce back it is almost invisible, which makes me wonder what it'll look like in the sun, or when a strip is lightly caked in mud. The Highlanders away jersey may look ok with blue, while the home strip could utilise the yellow decal as well.

Secondly, what is with rugby uniforms and putting logos on the chest? Sure that's where the market who watch rugby just to check out the players [and no, and now that I've got your attention, here's what I know you're after], but if you think about it, most of the time in rugby brodcast players are a. On the ground in a ruck or b. running with the ball. And holding it across their chest. Why not put your logo on the stomach and lower back? Then you get exposure from two angles, and mostly unimpeded.

I want to know how this design fiasco happened. The NZ Super Rugby teams have had really good strips since the Super 14 expansion, but this new batch look like they were put out with no thought. BNZ has its corporate colours, yes, but why not make some room for the teams which are going to be representing you? This is an example of the private sector barging its way into rugby without giving a shit about the fans - and it's a worrying sign.

 

PS: Could Stephen Brett be the first NZ Super 14 player to model jersies for two different teams in two years?

Resuming Transmission

Posted by Naly D on Tuesday, 02 Jun 2009.

Ohio. I'm back after a short hiatus, if it helps just imagine I went to South Africa to watch the final. So. What a final. I'd like to say was an even contest from the kickoff, but it wasn't. The Bulls were all over the Chiefs from go to whoa.

bulls_champs.jpg

A few thoughts I had while watching the game [I had more but can't remember them]:

Why oh why did the Chiefs take the perfectly good 'rush' defence and turn it into a 'blitz' defence. If you get a chance to watch the game again, watch Kahui and Donald on defence. They rush up off the line and get in the faces of Steyn, Olivier and Habana. Good call. Except that if you're going to do something like that it's better if everyone does it.

What resulted was that Donald and Kahui left a huge channel on their inside and outside shoulders. A skip pass or dummy across the defense and the Bulls were through. And they did it again, and again, and again.

Donald's run to set up the Masaga try was opportunistic, but showed fantastic vision. For the rest of the match he was pretty ordinary.

For the Chiefs, a positive was the fact Lauaki had an outstanding match. For the country, if it means he gets and All Black jersey, that's shit. Also, Olivier's tackle on my boy de Malmanche was fucking awesome.

How freaky looking was that one woman the camera kept panning over? The one who looked like she'd had too much plastic surgery.

How amazing is Habana? The first try he scored he completely outran Kahui, even while bending over to scoop up the ball. And as for his intercept, if you watch it again, he's marking his man and has enough time to step sideways, before bursting through the gap and grabbing the ball. He also got involved in quite a few rucks.

Didn't Kaplan bounce up well after he got absolutely dominated in that tackle?

The Bulls were amazing and played an outstanding, near perfect rugby match. Many international teams would have struggled to beat them, which is probably the reason there'll be so many of them in Springboks jerseys.

Bulls spank Chiefs in 2009 Super 14 Final [video]

Posted by noizy on Monday, 01 Jun 2009.

Enough said. Here's the highlights (courtesy of Rugbydump)...


At Least the Smartest Team Won

Posted by Naly D on Monday, 25 May 2009.

Yes, I'm still upset.


How Will the First Points be Scored in the Super 14 Final?

Posted by Naly D on Monday, 25 May 2009.
Penalty Kick
52% (13 votes)
Forwards Try
16% (4 votes)
Backs Try
8% (2 votes)
Dropgoal
20% (5 votes)
Penalty Try
4% (1 vote)
Total votes: 25
12next ›last »
Rugby Video from 3News.co.nz

Recent comments

New forum topics

Active forum topics

Poll

Latest posts elsewhere...

The Dropkicks are proudly brought
to you by Epic Beer.

online sports betting

in association with sportsfreak

Good mates of the Dropkicks